Blacks dating blacks

And members of smaller racial or ethnic groups may be more likely to intermarry because relatively few potential partners share their race or ethnicity. marriage market in 2015, yet their newlywed intermarriage rates were comparable to those of Asians, who comprised only 5% of the marriage market.But size alone cannot totally explain intermarriage patterns. And while the share of the marriage market comprised of Hispanics has grown markedly since 1980, when it was 6%, their intermarriage rate has remained stable.The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015.Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%. The pattern is similar among Asian newlyweds, three-fourths of whom are immigrants. Significant growth in the Hispanic and Asian populations in the U. since 1980, coupled with the high rates of intermarriage among Hispanic and Asian newlyweds, has been an important factor driving the rise in intermarriage.The share has tripled since 1980, when 3% of married people – about 3 million altogether – had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity.Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds.

To help personalise content, tailor and measure ads and provide a safer experience, we use cookies.The same was true in 1980, when 4% of recently married men and 4% of recently married women had intermarried.As is the case among whites, intermarriage is about equally common for newlywed Hispanic men and women.By 1980, the share of intermarried newlyweds had about doubled to 7%. All told, more than 670,000 newlyweds in 2015 had recently entered into a marriage with someone of a different race or ethnicity.By comparison, in 1980, the first year for which detailed data are available, about 230,000 newlyweds had done so.

Leave a Reply